Feb 16th 2014, 20:18:53
Originally posted by SAM_DANGER:
HELLO NANCIES!
I RECENTLY EXCHANGED MESSAGES WITH A PRIMARY SERVER PLAYER REGARDING WHAT YOU SIMPLETONS CALL THE "ROR". IN THESE MESSAGES, HE REFERRED TO TAKING RETALS AS "SUICIDING" IF THE COUNTRY DOING THE RETALIATING IS SMALLER AND HAS TO GO HEAVY ON OFFENSE IN ORDER TO BREAK. EVEN IF THE RETALIATOR TAKES HIS RETRIBUTION IN UNDER 24 HOURS.
NOW I AM WONDERING WHETHER THIS IS THE PREVAILING ATTITUDE ON THIS SERVER. I HAVE NOTICED A FEW "ROR"S BY PLAYERS WHO I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT WOULD NOT DO SUCH A THING. HAS THE PROTECTIONIST GDI ON THIS SERVER LED TO SUCH A SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT HERE THAT THE MAJORITY WILL NOT EVEN ACCEPT LEGITIMATE 1:1 RETALIATION?
SO, HOW MANY OF YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THE COUNTRY WHICH WAS AGGRESSED AGAINST IS "SUICIDING" IF HE/SHE BUYS UP A BOATLOAD OF JETS IN ORDER TO RETALIATE AGAINST HIS AGGRESSOR?
HA!
SAM
I RECENTLY EXCHANGED MESSAGES WITH A PRIMARY SERVER PLAYER REGARDING WHAT YOU SIMPLETONS CALL THE "ROR". IN THESE MESSAGES, HE REFERRED TO TAKING RETALS AS "SUICIDING" IF THE COUNTRY DOING THE RETALIATING IS SMALLER AND HAS TO GO HEAVY ON OFFENSE IN ORDER TO BREAK. EVEN IF THE RETALIATOR TAKES HIS RETRIBUTION IN UNDER 24 HOURS.
NOW I AM WONDERING WHETHER THIS IS THE PREVAILING ATTITUDE ON THIS SERVER. I HAVE NOTICED A FEW "ROR"S BY PLAYERS WHO I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT WOULD NOT DO SUCH A THING. HAS THE PROTECTIONIST GDI ON THIS SERVER LED TO SUCH A SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT HERE THAT THE MAJORITY WILL NOT EVEN ACCEPT LEGITIMATE 1:1 RETALIATION?
SO, HOW MANY OF YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT THE COUNTRY WHICH WAS AGGRESSED AGAINST IS "SUICIDING" IF HE/SHE BUYS UP A BOATLOAD OF JETS IN ORDER TO RETALIATE AGAINST HIS AGGRESSOR?
HA!
SAM
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.