Verified:

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jul 12th 2013, 3:37:46

This has a lot more to do with a lynching mob doing "justice" with their own hands than with soccer.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jul 12th 2013, 3:28:30

It is natural for a nation to spy other nations. One of the problems that Brazil is having with it is that we (and it seems India as well) are being spied more than our size would point as reasonable.

That said, things are mostly our own fault, since we don't invest money to assure the security of our communications (we don't own any sattelite or transmission lines, all our telecoms are multinationals, etc). Not even the software we use is national. At most we encripty some of our sensitive fluff...

Our intelligency agency only spies the opposition and allied political parties, nvm quase-terrorist internal moviments or foreign powers.

But it could be worse. We could be total lapdogs of the USA as portugal, spain, france and italy showed themselves to be just last week. We are just half-lapdogs here kekeke....

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 20th 2013, 20:05:45

Kekekeke

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 20th 2013, 6:10:45

Wow, i put bolty on ignore by mistake hahaha...

Anyways, i will try to show up on irc tomorrow, it is 3 am now.

*fluffes bolty and cyp*

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 17th 2013, 22:08:12

*humps*

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 17th 2013, 8:00:09

Congrats cyp!

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 17th 2013, 7:59:09

Lets celebrate failure!

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jun 17th 2013, 7:45:44

I am at the same job for 9 and a half years.

In 25 and a half more years maybe i will retire...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Mar 7th 2013, 11:26:34

He won't be missed.

While supposedly governing for the poor, he left venezuela's economy and industry a mess, left his country under a weird heavy cuban influence, weakened the essential state institutions (judiciary, legislative and local governments), weakened human fundamental rights (free speach, free press, free assembly, property rights, etc), supported FARC and almost started a war with colombia over it, almost caused a military coup in Paraguay, and supported several other latim american presidents undermine democracy in their own countries (Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia and Nicaragua).

That is from the top of my head.

Too bad bolivarianism won't die with him.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jan 26th 2013, 8:19:13

Originally posted by Magellaan:
How fast is very fast according to you? I think Id consider at least a couple decades for new technologies to be developed/implemented and upscaled as rather fast.

Biofuels, doesn't make a lot of sense to use agricultural land for fuel if you need to feed 9bil+ people. You could use algea maybe but if current technology would be upscaled that would make up only a couple % of transportation fuel at most right now. Still has a long way to go.

Hydrogen fuel, it's not very efficient as is. Then you also need to produce the hydrogen first which makes it even less efficient.

Electric vehicles, we'll be seeing more and more of these of course but it will also take a time before they can be produced at the same rate as 'fossil fuel' cars. And even then it will take time to replace all current cars. Easily takes a couple decades..
It would make sense too to change land use policies and actually walk and bike more and use mass transit.

Also, you need to produce your electricity using something else than fossil fuels. Maybe we'll have nuclear fusion power plants in the futures, but thats still decades away. Renewable energy.. takes a while too. Germany is looking at 20-30% renewable energy in 2020 but that will have taken them 2 decades to get there even though they created very favorable market conditions for it.

Now don't get me wrong, I think a lot is possible and we don't necesarilly have to panic but I really do think 'very fast' still means at least a couple decades with something as huge as this issue.




We likely already can feed 9 billion people, considering the world has over 7 billion, government's regulatory stock and plenty of fatties. Plenty of countries actually pay their farmers to not produce or to produce less than they can. Feeding is a no issue, the real problem is distribution (as in some of the poor can't afford to buy food).

During my life I have seen Brazil change a big part of its fuel source several times. Each round took a couple of years for full conversion. I don't expect it to take more than five years or so, tbh. Free markets do tend to be efficient and, like I said, the technology already is out there. We have vehycles on the streets using eletric, hydrogen and biofuels today.

To say that some or all of them aren't efficient just bring us back to the price issue again.

To say that a lack of energy production will be a problem is correct. But the solution for that is out there too. From nuclear power to alternate energy to coal power or hidro power. We will have to build them. It bets the hell out of watching the end of modern civilization.

And lets keep in mind that in real life oil won't end in the blink of an eye. As its supply dwindles, its price goes up, opening space to other techs.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jan 26th 2013, 1:40:25

It is bullfluff to say no alternate fuel can be scaled up to replace oil. It can't at current prices. If the price situation changes, the market adapts very fast. Most of the tech for biofuels, hydrogen fueled and eletric vehicles already is out there.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Jan 25th 2013, 22:50:20

There are alternate fuels to oil. It is just a matter of costs...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Dec 30th 2012, 20:42:25

Originally posted by Rednose:
I used to like sof back in the old earth. you had more decent guys than idiots.
In the new earth, you just suck.

I don't like the new MD either, but they can't hold the water to your cowardness.


Sometimes I wonder if it is ivan's fault that SoF became this IX caricature...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 30th 2012, 2:42:14

The people opposed to the laf-sof block aren't failing only in the recruiting war, they are also failing in the strategy and war tactics side of the game.

TIE and MD should have preempted SoF's FS, or at least MD should have FS SoF instead of th.e other way around.

Running a significant number of farmers in a war set is silly, unless you are planning to hit oop or almost oop or very late (like week 7 or so).

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 30th 2012, 2:29:41

[quote poster=Eric171; 20971; 388445]
Originally posted by TAN:
Originally posted by Eric171:
Members and leaders can and do criticize it while still playing there. Why can't ex-heads that retired do the same?



Because it's disrespectful to air such grievances in public. If he has a problem with how his former alliance is run, he should confer privately, not disrespect his entire former clan in front of the entire server.


Maybe it is cultural, but unless you are tied to the party line(which a leader is, but a retired player isn't), people should be free to say whatever the hell they want to say. Next thing you will be trying to police what martian, I or aponic say just because we are ex-heads too.

Your take, to me, is worse than that line ultra-nationalist people use about their own country to supress dissent(sp?): love it or leave it. By that line of thought at least we are freed if we leave it. In yours we never are free to criticize. :D



But if yall don't care, I don't care. I was just pointing out that he's not the only one who's completely changed after leaving his alliance.


Or maybe people just like to think that all they thought that was bad in SOF was Ivan's fault, then they go all wtf now...

Heh.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 30th 2012, 2:25:55

Originally posted by TAN:
Originally posted by Eric171:
Members and leaders can and do criticize it while still playing there. Why can't ex-heads that retired do the same?



Because it's disrespectful to air such grievances in public. If he has a problem with how his former alliance is run, he should confer privately, not disrespect his entire former clan in front of the entire server.


Maybe it is cultural, but unless you are tied to the party line(which a leader is, but a retired player isn't), people should be free to say whatever the hell they want to say. Next thing you will be trying to police what martian, I or aponic say just because we are ex-heads too.

Your take, to me, is worse than that line ultra-nationalist people use about their own country to supress dissent(sp?): love it or leave it. By that line of thought at least we are freed if we leave it. In yours we never are free to criticize. :D
I'm not saying anything related to the relevancy or accuracy of Ivan's posts - for all I know, it could be spot on. But if I were in his position, I wouldn't belittle my former clan like that - not if I still had any respect for it (which I know he does).

That's why I'm a bit confused.

But if yall don't care, I don't care. I was just pointing out that he's not the only one who's completely changed after leaving his alliance. [/quote]

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 28th 2012, 19:15:31

Members and leaders can and do criticize it while still playing there. Why can't ex-heads that retired do the same?

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 28th 2012, 2:10:08

Originally posted by martian:
emopod!


*humps martian*

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 27th 2012, 16:58:26

Ivan is correct when he says that SOF isn't interested in a good war. FS TIE and MD at the same time would have made things a lot more interesting and lasting.

Or maybe SOF is going to hit several more tags this set? That could be fun...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 25th 2012, 4:26:00

The case as explained by trife makes sense.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 25th 2012, 4:16:55

Originally posted by Pang:
sketchy fluff all over the place.

so much for a different SoF flavour in the post-Ivan era. RD shows their true colours (pun intended) yet again.

also, if you wanted a fair war, you'd have hit TIE+MD together; obliterating TIE then hitting MD -> more of the same fluff we see most rounds from SoF.

take on a challenge at some point, eh? continuing down the warpath of least resistance has to be getting tiring.


You are pretty naive if you think that all you have hated in sof is ivan's fault.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 22nd 2012, 20:24:30

Originally posted by Ivan:

lame move

that is all

F L U F F


Yep.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 8th 2012, 3:38:06



Cheers to retiring again...

*humps bolty*

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 6th 2012, 2:51:40

fluff

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 4th 2012, 22:31:14

Nice!

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 4th 2012, 22:03:07

Nice Dragon. :)

These many defends, iirc, beats your and others performance back in 2006/2007 when mehul screwed warring too much.

And a nice helmet fail here too hehe. :D

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 4th 2012, 3:05:14

Arguable the USA saved most of south america and central america of ending up as socialist totalitarian states, which would be arguable worse than the right wing dictatorships they ended up being.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Oct 1st 2012, 20:02:01

...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 29th 2012, 3:31:30

*humps swampy*

likely a mix of too much stock and people knowing i likely wont stonewall, bolty. :(

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 29th 2012, 1:51:04

Originally posted by Boltar:
Join a tag Eric we will make sure u war


Pfft. You people would likely kill me in the FS again. :P

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 28th 2012, 16:06:26

More reasons for me not to war again?

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 27th 2012, 5:18:27

Netting a few sets in peace wouldn't be a bad idea to recruit and rebuild.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 26th 2012, 2:53:01

Thanks cyp. :)

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 26th 2012, 2:06:54

I need a real end set date, as i can't find it.

And i am still stuck playing with an ipad, dont want to war etc...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 25th 2012, 22:16:31

I would like to know when the set ends...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 24th 2012, 19:51:05

The mobile interface needs to be worked some more.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 24th 2012, 4:21:20

Bonus

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 19th 2012, 5:40:19

The real number is between 10 and 20% if we consider income and payroll taxes for people between 20 and 60 years old, so yeah, it is a huge fluffup.

Worse, someone that isn't paying those two types of taxes right now likely paid them some time ago or will pay them in the near future, because that is how life works.

Smearing all of them ( or all people that vote democrat, for that matter ) is just too stupid.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 17th 2012, 21:07:41

Ivan ftw.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 12th 2012, 6:29:21

fluff

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 6th 2012, 6:44:59

Representative democracy won't end just because politics you dislike is being adopted around the world.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Sep 3rd 2012, 6:58:32

Bonus speech wins it.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 27th 2012, 2:16:09

Originally posted by Murf:
Who actually cares?


Bonus btw


Aponic obviously does care.

Anyway, bonus here too...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 26th 2012, 3:16:11

Darkmere was around when i came back to sol.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 23rd 2012, 2:09:27

I want to ffs pdm too... :D

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 23rd 2012, 2:01:46

We did have 1 month long set with turns gained each 15 minutes back during one of the EC test sets. It was fun.

Anyway, not to sound like a broken disc, but to really change game dinamycs we do need alliance war and lg features to be implemented at the game code level. That way limits can be implemented top down by the admins...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 21st 2012, 8:23:19

Bonus

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 19th 2012, 17:00:56

This is feedback.

And it does seem the changes are no good. Like SS, i also agree with the idea behind this, but the way it is being implemented is no good.

IMO, we need deep changes to game mechanics, putting limits to how alliances war, not this...

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 17th 2012, 22:00:22

Nothing wrong with putting tag names in a hat imo.

Eric171 Game profile

Member
460

Aug 17th 2012, 6:32:22

Heh, saw a few days ago a south park episode about Jersey.

Kekeke